AC 48416 Memo of Decision
Link to this blogpost:
https://motherearthtoo2022.blogspot.com/2026/07/ac-48416-memo-of-decision.html?m=1
I copied what I have on my publiusroots blogpost to make some corrections. It's hard on my legs to be accessing Wi-Fi at the door.
🛑
Pasted - corrections will be in blue 💙
I'm still working on this, struggling with cyber crime 😩 Saturday 4July2026 2:11pm
Blogger or whatever cyber criminal they give control to, altered all the text to Arial. Times Roman was the actual Memo of Decision. It is now all Arial. I will make all smaller font to be red, but need to get off now because they hack this fast! I will return to do that some point in time today, 7/4/2026 6:13 am/I have been up all night working on these things! I'm not dealing with justice or Due Process of Law! I am dealing with Obstruction of Justice and perversion of the law!
REF: Motion For Reconsideration To Modify includes several documents reflecting trial court corruption:
https://spaces.hightail.com/receive/sCwrsQWjCz/bW90aGVyZWFydGh0b28yMDIyQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==
You can't open it from the publiusroots blogpost. I tried. This blogpost is my solution to the problems on it.
AC48416
NHH-CV24-6024196-S : APPELLATE COURT OF CT
ANSONIA STATE
STREET : STATE OF CONNECTICUT
V : HOUSING SESSION
ANNE M. BRADLEY : See note 👿 below
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AFTER TRIAL
Plaintiff, Ansonia State Street, LLC, brought a summary process action on non-payment of rent against Defendant, Anne Bradley, seeking to recover possession of 360 State Street, Apt 719 in New Haven, Connecticut. Minor detail: PLAINTIFF violated the court order not to bring a summary process against the Appellant-Defendant. Illegal Notice to Quit was first reported in the complaint on AC48452; the court agreed the case had merit, that the Notice To Quit was not legitamate, allowing the Defendant to pay rent into court, yet rejecting her Motion To Pay Rent into Court as a matter of right to supplement the form due to the limitations in presenting the facts and law of the many circumstances of abuse and breach of the lease. This was a violation of Due Process of Law; something that these officials do frequently with malice and forethought. The complaint alleges that Defendant remains in possession of the premises despite failing to pay rent on August and September, 2024. Alayna Stone lies again; the rent was paid the same way as it was in July 2024 - checks were presented in the Housing Complaint, which was a case that was docketed first. Defendant filed an answer disagreeing with the allegations and raising the special defense of payment. Alayna Stone made no substantive statement here. She fails to admit there was a Housing Complaint already active. She fails to admit someone 20 years older than she is impersonated her at the Housing Complaint. She fails to admit that REAL Summary Processes provide for counterclaims; yet she claimed this was a real Summary Process. She failed to admit that SHE ruled on the inept MOTION TO DISMISS, and she denied Motion To Strike, which would have given the obvious incompetent Plaintiff opportunity to submit a corrected one. The intent is obviously a criminal collaboration with this criminal plaintiff. The law doesn’t matter. Their wanting to abuse the Defendant is all that matters, disregarding the many abuses experienced by the Defendant, who paid rent timely despite their criminal activity to including constant illegal entries and vandalism. All mentioned and NOT WEIGHED! The case was tried on January 13, 2025. Plaintiff was represented by counsel. The court deliberately waited months as a tactic to FORCE the Defendant to not pay rent into court for 3 months so the crooked officials at the Housing Authority could abuse process and stop paying the Section 8 supplement, which is all part o the HAP contract, which is the controlling lease. Defendant said in court, “Sure, let the Plaintiff submit the letter, it’s dated 2024, which means it has no legal value since it states the rent is to be paid beginning two years before that. Alayna Stone and Hoops FAKE ATTORNEY acted like Defendant was speaking a different language and continued their path of self-incrimination, by entering the ledger, which had the almost $14,000 balance REMOVED BY COURT ORDER. Kyle Huckle lied in court, claiming, “We wanted to give her a clean slate” (spin off of Judge Slater’s name, how ridiculous) at which time the Defendant stated she objected since the ledge states right on it was due to a court order. Kyle Huckle then clams up and says, “That’s above my payscale” regarding the court order, and Hoops refused to produce the court order! Another indication of self-incrimination. The property manager for Plaintiff testiied and submitted evidence. She fails to admit Kyle Huckle used the “That’s above my payscale” when he wanted to cover up their fraud. Defendant testified and submitted evidence. Alayna Stone’s handler must have told her to keep claiming the lies, since the BURDON OF PROOF IS ON THE PLAINTIFF, as emphasized by the Appellant-Defendant, and she just drew a blank as if she was microchipped and programmed or told to say and do certain things rather than administer the law.
This following paragraph must have been read off and copied from a book! Even adding “if any” OMG! There is no substance and not relevant to the case!
The Court fully considered and weighed all of the testimony and evidence received at trial, evaluated the credibility of the witnesses; assessed the weight, if any, to be given specific evidence and measured the probative force of conflicting evidence; has drawn such inferences from the evidence, or facts estalished by the evidence, that it deems reasonable and logical; reviewed and considered all the relevanty pleadings, evidence, and law, as well as balanced the equitable positions of the parties.
FACTUAL FINDINGS
The Court makes the following factual findings:
Plaintiff purchased property commonly known as 360 State Street in November, 2022. They have a LIMITED WARRANTEE DEED, SO-CALLED PURCHASED IT FOR $160 MILLION WHICH IS 4/64 OF THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING, AND HAVE AN $89 BILLION MORTGAGE! Minor details she left out because she is doing what she is told to do; not refleting any education or skill. At the time of the purchase, Defendant was residing at the premises pursuant to a one-year lease agreement from 2013 that automatically renewed on a month to month basis upon the expiration of the lease. Another lie! She just made lies like a day at the park! It is a HAP contract. The Contract is the lease. It says right on it. Any real judge would know that HAP contracts are the lease and it is impossible to have two leases for the same rental. They pulled the same shit all over again! In 2019 they had no pretermination letter! They failed to state any amount due because the ledger had a balance of over $8,000! The judge denied my motion to dismiss and was all set to get me evicted! He got a call to his chambers and came out with a completely different position! I won the case! Everything in my Motion To Dismiss was now granted! He was told to administer the law, do his damn job! It was then that I forwarded all my mail to the USPS mailbox I have had for many years. I saw an employee getting in my mail! She was doing what she was told to by Dragana LaCore! She said that and I didn’t doubt her. I told her this management and company that owns this building (Bozzutos) are crooked as hell. My mail was forwarded yet a postman took it upon himself to load up mail in my mailbox, to include placing mail that was RETURNED TO THE SENDER, 360 STATE STREET, in MY mailbox! I happen to catch the postman on the 19th of June and asked if he could check it. He told me to show him my ID and he carefully checked each piece to make sure it had my name on it - which meant that they were obviously told to put the mail belonging to the management there also! They also have in their property documents that one of the 50 apartments is used as a maintenance apartment - and they have been destroying so much in my apartment, I often told them they are like making my apartment to be used for spare parts! I did not realize that they seemed justified in doing so, humoring their psychopathic selves to the point where the maintenance manager smashed my door, forcing his way in and I screamed for my life and neither neighbor did anything but laugh about it! They were obviously told it was a joke by the depraved management! Worse yet, they may have told them I was having an orgasm! Even though this disgusting manager smashed in my door and had previously defecated in my trash can in my bathroom! The consequence telling the Housing Authority was just more hell! Much relayed in my Statement of Damages, which I provided a link for and will provide it here, since it is only good for 30 days; yet during that time, any interested party may download it as a file.
At the time of the original lease and through current, the total amount of rent due is $932. The fact she fails to indicate whether they were abated or not is proof they were abated! They obviously were told immediately in 2019 that the ledger was fraud and were ordered to remove all charges. They obviously went through a costly appeal process, that obsessed with getting rid of me to prove all crimes matter. They had to remove the charges, which grew to almost $14,000 and finally did so in February 2023, yet resumed their fraudulent billing all over again! Because Defendant receives assistance from Section 8, validation this Alayna Stone would be obligated to know the HAP contract is the only lease! she only pays a protion of the rental amount. The lease was not terminated! They still enjoy the HAP Payments, they submitted a lease without the “new owner’s name” - they failed to submit an addendum showing the “new owner’s name” and they criminally got the other Section 8 tenants to reapply for Section 8! How many were denied from that abuse? When there is a new owner, the owner has to be approved, not the Section 8 tenants. I cited and even copied 60 pages of laws regarding the process of new ownership and like mafia who find it easier to just pick up a gun and shoot; they lie their asses off! Her portion of is rent is determied annually after she completes an annual recertification. Previously, her portion was $198. No response to what I said in court regarding 42 USC 1437, that my rent cost has been overcharged since I moved here because I have a federal poverty level income and should only have to pay 10% of the fair use and value! They break law after law after law! Alayna Stone does nothing what a judge is supposed to do - she is just doing what the criminal underworld tells her to do! In January, 2022, Defendant’s portion was determined to be $264. Defendant has continued, however, to make payments of $198 per month, for a shortfall of $66 per month. She said Defendant failed to pay rent for August and September, then said I had shorted rent, and more BS - and I came right out and said at the hearing on my direct appeal she cannot be their attorney! I filed a Notice of Intent to Appeal! She did not acknowledge that either! This was probably typed for her by Hoopshit office, who are frauds! I underlined where more inept information was made, such as when the Summons was served - it was served on October 22, 2024! They had the date of October 23! I went to the courthouse on October 22! I said, “Where is the case in the system? You are supposed to have it docketed before they serve it; they are supposed to pay for it! Where is the proof of payment?” Attorney Pitt gave ma a line of shit about them being “Commissioners of the Court” when any attorney that goes to court is referred to that way! He was trying to allude some kind of super powers! Subject matter jurisdiction can only be what is on the Notice To Quit if a Summary Process is served - and the fact it was served AND VIOLATED THE COURT ORDER was completely removed from Alayna Stone as if she isn’t a judge and of course she is just a paid actor! Why would Defendant even have to tell them every damn thing they are supposed to do? And the Appellate Court seems to be chiming in as if it is a new fashion! Failing to issue a Memorandum of Decision, with only an order, and more!
On September 13, 2024, Plaintiff had served a notice to quit for nonpayment of rent on August 2024 and September 2024, with a quit date of October 18, 2024. The return date is supposed to be three days from the Notice, which is the date of termination of the lease, which is why they enter all payments thereafter are not rent! Defendant remains in possession of the premises.
DISCUSSION
“Summary process is a special statutory procedure designed to provide an expeditious remedy….It enable[s] landlords to obtain possession of leased premises without suffering the delay, loss and expense to which, under the commonlaw actions, they might be subjected by tenants wrongfully holding over their terms.” Pollansky v Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188, 191 (2013). Alayna Stone did not hear motions, denying them immediately most of the time! The housing court does NOT follow any Summary Process procedure because a Summary process allows the defendant to countersue! There are many other reasons they fail to abide by a summary process so this is just nonsense and she makes her rabbit hole even deeper by “defending” what they don’t even follow! To include ILLEGAL APPEARANCE, FAILURE TO VALIDATE THE BOZO WHO SHOWS IS AN ATTORNEY. Obviously the Hoops person is not an attorney! He said he was Peter Hoops at trial. I mentioned the real Peter Hoops entered the BAR in 1987! I should have demanded his proof of being an attorney, which they have to have on them at all times when they enter the court. Every damn thing the court is responsible for, they don’t do and play catch me if you can!
To prevail on a claim for nonpayment of rent, Plaintiff must establish the following essential elements: They didn’t VIOLATE THE COURT ORDER NOT TO SERVE A SUMMONS PROCESS! They not only served it but Attorney Pitt said it was no big deal! (1) a rental agreement; They failed to produce the HAP contract which is the controlling lease! It says so right on it! It also requires them to submit a pretermination letter prior to terminating the lease, which is what a Notice to Quit is - a termination of the lease! (2) that Plaintiff is the lessor or owner of the subject premises; duh! How about that plaintiff has a REAL ATTORNEY show up in court? Or that a real judge preside in court rather than a fraud who allowed someone to impersonate her at the first hearing, October 31, of the Housing Complaint? (3) the address of the subject premises; (4) the amount of rent due to Plaintiff from Defendant; Not validated using a letter dated 2024 saying rent is due two years before that! (5) when the rent was due to Plaintiff; (6) the date of the nonpayment; (7) the service of the notice to quit, as well as its service date and termination date Where on a Notice To Quit does it give a TERMINATION DATE? IT DOESN’T; and (8) that Defendant is still in possession. No mention of a Summons, which begins the damn case! In fact, Attorney Pitt said I could not do anything about the Notice To Quit because there was no case! The case begins IF a Summons is issued! Only then can they try to enforce the termination of lease, which is the Notice To Quit! General Statutes Section 47a-15a et seq. Alayna Stone further violates the case by failing to cite any HUD laws or rules! I cited many! Not a damn thing I said was responded to in this idiotic Memorandum of Decision - and obviously she has an awareness that a Memorandum of Decision is required yet deliberately refused to issue one even when I motioned for it and I submitted a statement of of noncompliance, which the Appellate Court already knew and should not have proceeded with the damn case without it!
The only element that is disputed in this case is the amount of rent that was due to Plaintiff. WTF! The fact they violated the court order not to serve Defendant a Summons, the fact that the insufficiency of service on both NTQ and Summons *which did not even have the case info on it! Required for me to file an appearance within 3 days as required by law - RETURN DATE WAS ILLEGAL AND THEY MADE IT MORE ILLEGAL BY PANCAKING MORE FRAUD ABOUT Nov 4 vs Nov 12 which was on the case information - obviously a secret code for Alayna Stone to rule a dismissal of the case on Nov 12! THE COMPLAINT WAS NOT EVEN HEARD YET AND ALL OF MY MOTIONS, INLUDING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY were not heard and ruled on, and those that were ruled on for the most part were not heard - and also required for me to Answer, and motion to dismiss, etc! Kyle Huckle, the property manager for the Plaintiff, credibly “That’s above my payscale” he says. Credibly? testified that the Housing Authority of New Haven pays $668 They should have been abated more!!!! of the $932 due for rent, leaving the balance of $264 as Defendant’s portion. His testimony was corroborated by a recertification letter received by Plaintiff indicating that Defendant’s portion became $264 as of January 2022.
**(In April 2024, Plaintiff requested another copy of the recertification letter, as it had not received it from the previous owner of the property -this footnote was snuck in by the “judge” who is probably not even an attorney, and for emphasis, she said ANOTHER COPY and the letter submitted to the court was dated April 2024! Then a rent demand backdated to 2022! If there was any copy, they would have copied an already certified copy! Additionally, defendant is required to sign/agree to the rent and yet nothing like that occurred. As already mentioned in various segments of the brief, supplement to brief, and in motions - DEFENDANT HAS REQUESTED A HEARING FROM THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR 13 YEARS AND THEY REFUSE!). **Appellant-Defendant’s note
Although Defendant contends that she had paid her rent in full and on time every month, and provided receipts of her $198 payments for July, August, and September, her testimony also demonstrates that she knew or should have known that her rental portion was $264. WTF - demonstrates? Another bookfind with no relevance, just a fake term which has no meaning for a real case’s Memo of Decision! They are supposed to indicate WHAT - WHO - WHY! Specifically, Defendant testified that every month that she made a rental payment she would ask for, and receive, a ledger admitted to evidence shows that beginning in January, 2023, when Plaintiff began listing the Section 8 and tenant portions separately. Defendant’s portion was $264 per month. Alayna Stone keeps flip-flopping! Saying the rent was not paid for August and September, now this, as if she can make up her own subject matter jurisdiction as if she is the attorney for the Plaintiff! Why not? After all, a real attorney did not even appear for the Plaintiff!
Defendant also testified that she had not received the recertification letter from Section 8 because she does not receive mail at her apartment. There was no testimony WTF!!! I gave testimony, she relays what my testimony was, and then says there was no testimony! however, that she has her mail forwarded to a post office box or that she provided the Housing Authority with a change of mailing address form when she decided to longer longer check her mail at the premises.WTF Defendant’s failure WTF to pick up her mail does not resolve her of the obligation to be aware of her tenant portion. For August and September, 2024, Defendant was required to pay $264 per month. She paid $198 per month. Accordingly, Plaintiff has established all of the elements for nonpayment of rent and Defendant’s special defense fails. They are not all of the REQUIREMENTS to qualify for a valid Summons - she didn’t even refer to the damn summons, which initiates the case! The Summons cannot have on it any more than the Notice to Quit, which is a federal termination of the lease, which is enforced only when a Summons is served AFTER the case is docketed!
The Court hereby enters judgment of possession in favor of Plaintiff. Balancing the equities, the Court will stay of execution until March 31, 2026, WTF - no real judge with half a brain would say this when a NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL WAS SERVED PRIOR TO TRIAL SINCE THE CASE WAS NOT DISMISSED and she kept riding on fraud! with a use and ocupancy payment of $264 due by the 10th of the month for February and March.
BY THE COURT,
Alayna M, Stone, Judge
She stopped using her Juris Number, which is fake anyway!
The Court fully considered and weighed all of the testimony and evidence received at trial, evaluated the credibility of the witnesses; assessed the weight, if any, to be given specific evidence and measured the probative force of conflicting evidence; has drawn such inferences from the evidence, or facts estalished by the evidence, that it deems reasonable and logical; reviewed and considered all the relevanty pleadings, evidence, and law, as well as balanced the equitable positions of the parties.
defense fails. They are not all of the REQUIREMENTS to qualify for a valid Summons - she didn’t even refer to the damn summons, which initiates the case! The Summons cannot have on it any more than the Notice to Quit, which is a federal termination of the lease, which is enforced only when a Summons is served AFTER the case is docketed!
The Court hereby enters judgment of possession in favor of Plaintiff. Balancing the equities, the Court will stay of execution until March 31, 2026, WTF - no real judge with half a brain would say this when a NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL WAS SERVED PRIOR TO TRIAL SINCE THE CASE WAS NOT DISMISSED and she kept riding on fraud! with a use and ocupancy payment of $264 due by the 10th of the month for February and March.
BY THE COURT,
Alayna M, Stone, Judge
She stopped using her Juris Number, which is fake anyway!
Comments
Post a Comment